Channel and offer selection
Which two channels are worth funding for your business, and the offer that goes in front of them.
Lead systems
For businesses whose pipeline still depends on referrals and word of mouth.
They’re a queue you don’t control, and it empties without warning.
A month with no referrals looks exactly like the month before a good one arrives. Neither tells you what to do next.
If nothing records which channel produced the work, there is no way to fund it deliberately.
Capacity fills, the search for work stops, and the pipeline is empty again by the time anyone looks.
What you get
Which two channels are worth funding for your business, and the offer that goes in front of them.
Accounts, campaigns and tracking built in your name, structured so spend can be traced to outcomes.
Pages written for one buyer and one action, rather than a homepage asked to do every job at once.
Every enquiry lands somewhere defined, tagged with where it came from, assigned to a person.
The messages that go out when nobody remembers to send them, in your voice and on a schedule.
A record of which channel, campaign and page produced each enquiry, readable without us.
Where we start
Before any package gets proposed. None of this requires you to have tidied anything up first.
Your last twelve months of closed work, traced back to first touch as far as the records allow.
Existing search visibility, the pages doing the work, and the words buyers actually type.
The path from form submission to first human reply, and the point where it reliably stalls.
Sequence
First 30 days
Trace historic work back to its source, pick the one or two channels worth funding, and agree the offer we put in front of them.
Next 30
Landing pages, capture, routing and follow-up go live as one connected path. Tracking goes in before traffic does.
Then
Spend follows evidence. Channels producing qualified enquiries get more; the rest get cut rather than defended.
A sequence, not a set of deadlines. What moves first depends on what we find in the first two weeks.
The split
Published before the first call, so nobody discovers halfway through that the work needed more of your week than anyone said.
| Minchin handles |
|
|---|---|
| You provide |
|
| Shared |
|
How this gets judged
Someone arrives from a channel we can name.
They ask for something. Source recorded automatically.
They match the work you want. Judged against criteria you set.
A conversation in the diary: the first number tied to revenue.
Where a buyer touches several channels before they enquire, attribution gets approximate. We’ll tell you when a number is an estimate rather than presenting it as fact.
Fit
Before you book
Engagements are scoped after the first call, once we know which channels are worth funding and what already exists. You get a fixed build fee, and where paid channels are involved a media budget that sits in your own accounts. We don’t mark that up.
The build takes the first few weeks. Paid channels can produce enquiries almost immediately and take longer to produce good ones; search compounds slowly and keeps paying afterwards. We’ll tell you which your situation calls for rather than selling you both.
No. Referrals are the best leads you get. The point is to stop them being the only ones.
You do. Ad accounts, analytics, CRM and domains are set up in your name and stay in your name if we stop working together.
Then we start by finding out which of them produced work. Usually some of the spend is defensible and some isn’t, and cutting the second half is the fastest saving available.
Yes. Landing pages and follow-up sequences are ours to draft. You correct anything that misrepresents the business, which is faster for you than writing it from scratch.
You keep the system, the documentation and the accounts. It runs the same way the day after we stop as it did the day before.
One call, no deck. We’ll tell you what we’d build first and what it would take.